Active Sync · macOS · 300 seconds

SynciZen syncs your files
without hijacking your Mac.

Both apps synced identical files simultaneously. SynciZen never exceeded 26.1% CPU. Insync spiked to 99.4% — nearly maxing out a full CPU core.

up to 7.8×
Less Average CPU
while syncing
0.44% vs 3.45%
up to 7.8×
Less CPU Energy
consumed
1.08 vs 8.46 CPU-sec
up to 3.8×
Lower worst-case
CPU spike
26.1% vs 99.4%
0 s
CPU spikes above 20%
Insync: 4.5 seconds
up to 42.2 MB
Less RAM used
on average
168.3 MB vs 210.5 MB

CPU % Over Time — Active Sync

300 seconds · sampled every 2s · lower is better

RAM Usage Over Time — Active Sync

300 seconds · sampled every 2s · lower is better

Average CPU %

lower is better

SynciZen 0.44% 7.8× less
0.44%
Insync 3.45%
3.45%

Peak CPU Spike

lower is better

26.1%
SynciZen
99.4%
Insync

CPU Energy (300s)

lower is better

SynciZen 1.08 CPU-sec 7.8× less
1.08s
Insync 8.46 CPU-sec
8.46s

* macOS benchmark · SynciZen 4.6.3 (Balance profile) vs Insync v3.8.7 · MacBook Pro M3 Pro · 300-second active sync test · sampled every 0.5s · both apps performing identical file sync operations simultaneously.

Idle · macOS · 300 seconds

Even doing nothing,
Insync still burns your battery.

No sync activity just both apps open in the background. Insync spiked to 42.2% CPU and averaged 3.99%. SynciZen averaged 0.30% and never crossed 13.3%.

up to 13.3×
Less Average CPU
while idle
0.30% vs 3.99%
up to 3.2×
Lower Peak CPU
while idle
13.3% vs 42.2%
up to 13.3×
Less CPU Energy
at rest
0.72 vs 9.59 CPU-sec
0 s
CPU spikes above 20%
Insync: 5.0 seconds
up to 1.8 MB
Less RAM
while idle
159.7 MB vs 161.5 MB

Average CPU %

lower is better

SynciZen 0.30% 13.3× less
0.30%
Insync 3.99%
3.99%

Peak CPU Spike

lower is better

13.3%
SynciZen
42.2%
Insync

CPU Energy (300s)

lower is better

SynciZen 0.72 CPU-sec 13.3× less
0.72s
Insync 9.59 CPU-sec
9.59s

* macOS idle benchmark · SynciZen 4.6.3 (Balance profile) vs Insync · MacBook Pro M3 Pro · 300 seconds · no sync activity · sampled every 0.5s.

Architecture

SynciZen: always 2 processes.
Insync: spawns a new one for every batch.

How Insync handles sync tasks

During the 300-second test, Insync spawned 31 short-lived worker processes (~9 seconds each) on top of its 2 persistent processes. SynciZen completed the same work with its 2 permanent processes — no spawning, no overhead.

SynciZen — always 2 processes
syncizen (persistent)
rclone (persistent)
Both processes run the entire test. No spawning.
Insync — 2 persistent + 31 spawned workers
Insync (persistent)
isdaemon (persistent)
Each small bar = a short-lived worker process (~9s lifespan). Spawned one at a time.
Full Comparison

Every number, side by side.

Metric SynciZen Insync Advantage
Avg CPU — Active Sync 0.44% 3.45% 7.8× less
Peak CPU — Active Sync 26.1% 99.4% 3.8× lower
CPU Energy — Active (300s) 1.08 CPU-sec 8.46 CPU-sec 7.8× less
Avg CPU — Idle 0.30% 3.99% 13.3× less
Peak CPU — Idle 13.3% 42.2% 3.2× lower
CPU Energy — Idle (300s) 0.72 CPU-sec 9.59 CPU-sec 13.3× less
Avg RAM — Active Sync 168.3 MB 210.5 MB 42.2 MB less
Avg RAM — Idle 159.7 MB 161.5 MB 1.8 MB less
CPU spikes above 20% Never Active: 2.5s · Idle: 1s Zero
Simultaneous processes 2 3 (+ spawns workers)
Built with Rust
Native macOS UI
Multiple Google accounts
Selective sync

* macOS benchmark · SynciZen 4.6.3 (Balance profile) vs Insync · MacBook Pro M3 Pro · Feb 2026 · both tests: 300 seconds · sampled every 0.5s.

Active Sync · Linux · 300 seconds

SynciZen syncs your files
without maxing out your CPU.

Both apps synced identical files simultaneously. SynciZen peaked at 12% CPU. Insync spiked to 104% — maxing out a full core, with 5.5 seconds above 20% and 4.5 seconds above 50%.

up to 2.6×
Less Average CPU
while syncing
0.77% vs 1.99%
up to 2.6×
Less CPU Energy
consumed
2.30 vs 5.96 CPU-sec
up to 8.7×
Lower worst-case
CPU spike
12% vs 104%
0 s
CPU spikes above 20%
Insync: 5.5 seconds
up to 262 MB
Less RAM used
on average
296 MB vs 557 MB

CPU % Over Time — Active Sync (Linux)

300 seconds · sampled every 2s · lower is better

RAM Usage Over Time — Active Sync (Linux)

300 seconds · sampled every 2s · lower is better

Average CPU %

lower is better

SynciZen 0.77% 2.6× less
0.77%
Insync 1.99%
1.99%

Peak CPU Spike

lower is better

12%
SynciZen
104%
Insync

CPU Energy (300s)

lower is better

SynciZen 2.30 CPU-sec 2.6× less
2.30s
Insync 5.96 CPU-sec
5.96s

* Linux benchmark · SynciZen vs Insync · 300-second active sync test · sampled every 0.5s.

Idle · Linux · 300 seconds

Half the RAM,
even when doing nothing.

No sync activity both apps open in the background. SynciZen uses 48% less RAM (289 MB vs 555 MB). Both stay under 4% CPU when idle.

up to 48%
Less RAM
while idle
289 MB vs 555 MB
up to 266 MB
Smaller memory
footprint
SynciZen: 2 processes
0 s
CPU spikes above 20%
Both: 0 seconds
2
Processes (SynciZen)
Insync: 5+ (QtWebEngine)
<0.5%
Avg CPU when idle
Both stay ultra-low

Average RAM (MB)

lower is better

SynciZen 289 MB 48% less
289 MB
Insync 555 MB
555 MB

Peak CPU % (Idle)

lower is better

SynciZen 4%
4%
Insync 2%
2%

CPU Energy (300s) Idle

lower is better

SynciZen 1.08 CPU-sec
1.08s
Insync 0.54 CPU-sec
0.54s

* Linux idle benchmark · SynciZen vs Insync · 300 seconds · no sync activity · sampled every 0.5s.

Full Comparison

Linux benchmark summary.

Metric SynciZen Insync Advantage
Avg CPU — Active Sync 0.77% 1.99% 2.6× less
Peak CPU — Active Sync 12% 104% 8.7× lower
CPU Energy — Active (300s) 2.30 CPU-sec 5.96 CPU-sec 2.6× less
Avg RAM — Active Sync 296 MB 557 MB 47% less
Avg RAM — Idle 289 MB 555 MB 48% less
CPU spikes above 20% Never 5.5 seconds Zero
Process count 2 5+ (incl. QtWebEngine)

* Linux benchmark · SynciZen vs Insync · Feb 2026 · Legion 5 · 300 seconds · sampled every 0.5s.

Active Sync · Windows · 300 seconds

SynciZen syncs 16× more efficiently
on Windows.

Both apps synced identical files simultaneously. SynciZen averaged just 0.65% CPU and peaked at 34%. Insync averaged 10.46% and spiked to 120% — staying above 20% for 7 seconds and above 50% for 6.5 seconds.

up to 16×
Less Average CPU
while syncing
0.65% vs 10.46%
up to 16×
Less CPU Energy
consumed
0.47 vs 7.53 CPU-sec
up to 3.5×
Lower worst-case
CPU spike
34% vs 120%
0.5 s
CPU spikes above 20%
Insync: 7.0 seconds
up to 28.8 MB
Less RAM used
on average
43.8 MB vs 72.6 MB

CPU % Over Time — Active Sync (Windows)

300 seconds · sampled every 2s · lower is better

RAM Usage Over Time — Active Sync (Windows)

300 seconds · sampled every 2s · lower is better

Average CPU %

lower is better

SynciZen 0.65% 16× less
0.65%
Insync 10.46%
10.46%

Peak CPU Spike

lower is better

34%
SynciZen
120%
Insync

CPU Energy (300s)

lower is better

SynciZen 0.47 CPU-sec 16× less
0.47s
Insync 7.53 CPU-sec
7.53s

* Windows benchmark · SynciZen vs Insync · Windows 11 Pro · Intel Core i7-14650HX · 300-second active sync test · sampled every 0.5s · both apps performing identical file sync operations simultaneously.

Idle · Windows · 300 seconds

20× less CPU, 3.6× less RAM,
even doing nothing.

No sync activity both apps open in the background. SynciZen averaged just 0.10% CPU and 18.9 MB RAM. Insync averaged 2.03% CPU and held onto 68.3 MB RAM — with periodic spikes up to 19%.

up to 20×
Less Average CPU
while idle
0.10% vs 2.03%
up to 4.75×
Lower Peak CPU
while idle
4% vs 19%
up to 20×
Less CPU Energy
at rest
0.06 vs 1.20 CPU-sec
up to 3.6×
Less RAM
while idle
18.9 MB vs 68.3 MB
2
Processes (SynciZen)
Insync: 2 (incl. CEF)

Average CPU % (Idle)

lower is better

SynciZen 0.10% 20× less
0.10%
Insync 2.03%
2.03%

Peak CPU Spike (Idle)

lower is better

4%
SynciZen
19%
Insync

Average RAM (MB) Idle

lower is better

SynciZen 18.9 MB 3.6× less
18.9 MB
Insync 68.3 MB
68.3 MB

* Windows idle benchmark · SynciZen vs Insync · Windows 11 Pro · Intel Core i7-14650HX · 300 seconds · no sync activity · sampled every 0.5s.

Full Comparison

Windows benchmark summary.

Metric SynciZen Insync Advantage
Avg CPU — Active Sync 0.65% 10.46% 16× less
Peak CPU — Active Sync 34% 120% 3.5× lower
CPU Energy — Active (300s) 0.47 CPU-sec 7.53 CPU-sec 16× less
Time above 20% CPU (active) 0.5 s 7.0 s 14× less
Time above 50% CPU (active) 0 s 6.5 s Zero
Avg RAM — Active Sync 43.8 MB 72.6 MB 1.7× less
Avg CPU — Idle 0.10% 2.03% 20× less
Peak CPU — Idle 4% 19% 4.75× lower
Avg RAM — Idle 18.9 MB 68.3 MB 3.6× less
CPU spikes above 20% (idle) 0 s 0 s
Process count 2 2 (incl. CEF)
Built with Rust
Multiple Google accounts
Selective sync

* Windows benchmark · SynciZen vs Insync · Mar 2026 · Windows 11 Pro · Intel Core i7-14650HX · 300 seconds · sampled every 0.5s.

Benchmark Disclaimer. All metrics and numbers reported on this page were measured on controlled lab devices under identical conditions. Actual performance may vary based on your hardware specifications, operating system version, background processes, available RAM, storage type, and network conditions. Results on your machine may be higher or lower than those shown here.

The benchmark scripts used to generate these results are publicly available at github.com/shahabahreini/SynciZen-community/tree/main/bechmark_scripts we encourage technically inclined users to run them on their own hardware and share their findings. The 15-day free trial provides ample time to evaluate SynciZen's real-world performance on your own devices before making a purchase decision.

Real benchmarks · macOS, Linux & Windows · Mar 2026

The numbers don't lie.

SynciZen uses up to 16× less CPU during active sync on Windows and up to 20× less when idle. Your battery, CPU, and RAM will thank you on Mac, Linux, and Windows.

Start 15-Day Free Trial

No credit card · macOS, Linux & Windows · Cancel anytime